Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Clem Mill & Gin Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1966No. 5-4007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The principal question is whether an employee who suffers a scheduled injury which proves to be totally and permanently disabling is entitled only to the restricted compensation specified for the scheduled injury or to the greater benefits provided for total and permanent disability. The commission took the more liberal view, but its award was set aside by the circuit court. We agree with the commission.

The claimant, at the time of his injury in 1961, was a 50-year-old manual laborer, unable to read or write. His accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gonzales v. Gackle Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Johnson v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. Jackson Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Anchor Construction Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Bemberg Iron Works v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Arkansas Wood Products v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Cooper Industrial Products, Inc. v. WorthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API