Legal Opinion

Austin v. Kemper Independence Insurance Company (2167877)

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 5, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01120Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-01120-EMC (EMC) 5 Plaintiffs, 6 y. ORDER STAYING CASE 7 KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE COMPANY (2167877), et al., Defendants. ° The Court may stay proceedings in the interests of judicial efficiency and fairness. Landis v. N. Am. Co.,

299 U.S. 248, 254

(1936) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control disposition of the cases on its docket with economy of E time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”). Such a stay may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Chestman, United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Ali v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API