Drcha v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this action for personal injuries the jury found for plaintiff. On defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, there was an order denying the motion for judgment but granting that for a new trial, not for errors of law, but “upon the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence.” Defendant appeals from the whole order, and the case is now before us on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss that appeal. That motion is granted.
Defendant’s contention, that G. S. 1928 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9495, gives it the right of appeal, is untenable. True,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Snyder v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Kalz v. Winona & St. Peter Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Greenberg v. National Council of Knights and Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lincoln v. RaviczSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laramie Motors, Inc. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Hicks v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schaumburg v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Mallery v. Northfield Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935