Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Smith

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-0373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Before the court are plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, to dismiss. There are no disputed issues of material fact. Plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, 8 U.S.C. § 1329, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 declaring that Teresa Rivas is qualified as a nonimmigrant temporary worker as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii):

The term “immigrant” means every alien except ... an alien having a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Compton James Richards v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Richard B. Pesikoff v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. CONTOPOULOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Sweet Life v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Sussex Engineering, Ltd. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Young China Daily v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  4. Button Depot, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  5. Volt Technical Services Corp. v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API