In Re Administration of the Estate of Suskin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
To determine whether the appointment of John Arch-bell Wilkinson administrator of the estate of Louis B. Suskin, deceased, was void ab initio, because improvidently made in a case of testacy, Springs v. Irvin, 28 N. C., 27, or de facto sufficient until revoked, Shober v. Wheeler, 144 N. C., 403, 57 S. E., 152, would avail but little on the present record, for, so far as the instant case is concerned, both alternatives lead to the same result. C. S., 30. See 23 C. J., 1032; Oroswell’s Executors and Administrators, ch. 21, p. 432. It is enough to observe that the revocation was not for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Will of HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Shields v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Conrad v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Pratt v. . KitterellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- In Re the Will of CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re Applications for Reassignment BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Gaucher v. Estate of CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- In re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948