Legal Opinion

In re Will of Puett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal of Teila WilsoN.

DeviN, J.

The testamentary disposition of property is governed by statute. In order that a paper-writing, so designed, may effectuate this purpose it must have been executed and proven in strict compliance with the statutory requirements. G. S., 31-3, 31-18. When executed, proven *11and recorded in manner and form as prescribed, it is given conclusive legal effect as the last will and testament of the decedent, subject only to be vacated on appeal or declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction in a proceeding instituted for that purpose. Crowell v. Bradsher, 203 N.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API