Legal Opinion
Kabrovski v. City of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 3, 2015No. 15-CV-6030 CJSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, who operate a.restaurant in the City of Rochester, commenced this ¿ction pursuant to 42 U.S;C. § 1983 after the defendant City of Rochester Planning Commission restricted their ability to *418present live outdoor amplified music. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion (Docket.'No., [#6]) to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The application is granted.
BACKGROUND
At the outset the Court must determine what facts it may consider when ruling upon Defendants’ motion. It…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Almashiakhy v. WrayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- Becker v. City of Hillsboro, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Bimber's Delwood, Inc. v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- David Blatt v. Town of Pleasant Valley, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Essex One, LLC v. Town of EssexDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.