Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maatschappij N.V.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 23, 1965No. 64 Ad. 511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANNELLA, District Judge.

Motion for reargument by the libellant, pursuant to Rule 9(m) of the General Rules for the Southern District of New York, is granted. The court has examined the grounds asserted by the movant to have been allegedly overlooked by the court in reaching its determination, but finds them without merit. The court adheres to its original decision. However, an issue as to the damage limitation contained in the contract of carriage between the parties, raised improperly now for the first time, indicates that the original decision of this court conditionally declining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Takemura & Company v. the SS Tsuneshima MaruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Otis McAllister & Co., a Corporation v. Skibs, A/s Marie BakkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Pakhuismeesteren, S.A. v. S/S GoettingenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. General Motors Overseas Operation, Division of General Motors Corp. v. S.S. GoettingenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hairston v. McLean Trucking Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1972
  2. Zucker v. SableDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API