Legal Opinion

Geary v. Schroering

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 6, 1998No. 1998-CA-002089-OAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING CR 76.36 RELIEF

The trial court ordered the plaintiff, Rachel Geary, to sign a blank medical authorization submitted by the defendants, Samuel Grant and Welding & Therapy Services, Inc. Geary petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition. Upon review of the petition, response, the trial court order as well as the Civil Rules of Procedure and case law, this Court grants the writ to prohibit the enforcement of the order which compels Geary to sign a medical authorization permitting the “unrestricted release” of all her medical information.

Geary filed a complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  3. Humana, Inc. v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  4. Munroe v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Christoff v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peters v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  2. Deer Run Estates, LLC v. Hon Darren W. Peckler Judge, Mercer Circuit Court, Et AlKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Deer Run Estates, LLC v. Hon Darren W. Peckler Judge, Mercer Circuit Court, Et AlKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  4. EL CORTEZ RENO HLD'S, LLC v. PFPCO.'S NOBLE PIE PARLOR C/W 88370Nevada Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API