Legal Opinion
Black v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 12, 2024No. 6:23-cv-01218Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS FAYE BLACK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 23-cv-1218-EFM-ADM UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10). Plaintiffs Faye Black and Jeannine Tolson assert five claims against Defendant because of leaked hazardous materials that have contaminated Plaintiffs’ property. These are: (1) negligence; (2) private nuisance; (3) trespass; (4) violation of K.S.A. § 65-6203, Kansas’s discharge statute; and (5) unjust enrichment. In…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.