Legal Opinion

Starchroom Publishing Co. v. Threlkeld Engraving Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Defendant in error brought suit in the superior court of Cincinnati against the plaintiff in error on an account. For the purposes of this decision it will not be necessary to consider the propriety of the form of action. The undisputed testimony shows that the Publishing Company bought material of- the Engraving Company, for which it was to pay three-fourths of the price in cash, the remainder to be paid by advertising space in “The Starch Room” (a laundry journal published by the Publishing Company), “to be taken and used by the plaintiff.” The Engraving Company thereafter…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Thomas E. Magness Harry E. Redman, Debtors. John Paul Rieser, Trustee v. The Dayton Country Club Company and Cynthia Magness KarasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Morris v. Investment Life Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Lucas v. Gross Motor Car Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. In Re Thomas E. Magness Harry E. Redman, Debtors. John Paul Rieser, Trustee v. The Dayton Country Club Company and Cynthia Magness KarasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API