Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Thomas E. Magness Harry E. Redman, Debtors. John Paul Rieser, Trustee v. The Dayton Country Club Company and Cynthia Magness Karas

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1992No. 91-4041Published

1Concurrence

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge,

concurring in result.

Although I agree with the result reached by the court, I arrive at the result by different reasoning. For me, the entire case turns on the meaning of the term “applicable law” appearing in the two relevant portions of section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, which governs the trustee’s assumption (or rejection) of executory contracts within the debtor’s estate. Section 365(f) is considered the “general rule” and, by nullifying anti-assignment provisions in private contracts and in “applicable law,” embodies the policy favoring the alienability…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Taylor Manufacturing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  3. Lough v. Varsity Bowl, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Starchroom Publishing Co. v. Threlkeld Engraving Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API