Legal Opinion
United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 14, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Before the Court is the government’s motion to strike the claim of Afghanistan International Bank (“AIB”) for lack of statutory standing. Dkt. 93. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arises from a civil forfeiture complaint against $77,920,605 that the government alleges was fraudulently obtained as payment for transportation of United States military supplies in Afghanistan by Hikmatullah Shadman, his associates, and companies he controls. Dkt. 3 ¶ 2. To date,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Fbme Bank Ltd. v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. $1,879,991.64 Previously Contained in Sberbank of Russia's InterbankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- United States v. $9,781,900.00 of Funds in the Name of Falcon Strategic SolutionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.