Legal Opinion
Hills v. Burnett
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1963No. 34923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
This action was brought in the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, by Elvin E. Hills and Margie Hills, the plaintiffs, to cancel a contract of conditional sale for the purchase of a house trailer and to recover the payments made upon the contract. After the contract had been executed it was assigned by the defendant, Earle M. Burnett, Sr., to the defendant, Michigan National Bank.
The trial court found that the contract was void and entered judgment for the plaintiffs. Upon appeal to this court, that judgment was affirmed. Hills v. Burnett, 172 Neb. 370, 109 N. W. 2d 739.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rueger v. HawksNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Baker v. Union Stock Yards National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Hills v. BurnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher v. First National Bank of OmahaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Helco, Inc. v. First National City BankDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1971
- Atlantic Quality Construction Corp. v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
- Bair v. Michigan National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.