Legal Opinion

The Columbus

District Court, D. California

Decided May 12, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The question to be determined in this case is—Does a lien exist in favor of a material-man who has supplied a vessel in her home port at the request of her master after having been notified by the owner that the vessel has been let to the master to be run on shares, and to be manned and victualled by him, and that if supplies are furnished to her it must be exclusively on his personal credit?

The supreme court has decided in the case of The Lottawanna, 21 Wall. [88 U. S.] 585, that under the general maritime law. as received in the United States, no lien exists in favor…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  2. Stephenson v. The FrancisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1884
  3. Pittmans v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1892
  4. The UnderwriterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
  5. The Hattie LowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API