Wagoner v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendants contend the Commission erred by applying an improper standard to the evidence, and that its determination thus was based on a misapprehension of the law. We agree.
This Court recently stated:
The plenary powers of the Commission are such that upon review, it may adopt, modify or reject the findings of fact of the Hearing Commissioner, and in doing so may weigh the evidence and make its own determination as to the weight and credibility of the evidence. Hollar v. Furniture Co., 48 N.C. App. 489, 269 S.E. 2d 667 (1980). The Industrial Commission has the duty and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hollar v. Montclair Furniture Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Cauble v. MacKe Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Buck v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Rooks v. IDEAL CEMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Mills v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ballenger v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Harmon v. Public Service of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Ballenger v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Bennett v. Progressive Furniture CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
- Crowder v. Preston Trucking Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.