Legal Opinion

People v. Diola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because defendant does not contend that the waiver of his right to appeal was constitutionally defective or that there is a public policy impediment to enforcing the waiver, appellate review of his contention regarding the sufficiency of the guilty plea is foreclosed. Review of the legality of the sentence is not foreclosed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

Contrary to defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. FewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. CooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API