Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Darrel Demont Farrar v. State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided December 19, 2002No. 11-01-00231-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceJim R. Wright, Justice

For the reasons stated in this opinion, I would hold that, under our current law, the State was required to and did prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecution was not limitations-barred. I would agree with the majority that appellant waived any error in connection with the ruling on his motion to quash. However, I would hold that the trial court was exercising appropriate discretion when it conducted an evidentiary pretrial hearing on appellant’s motion to quash the indictment. At the risk of being redundant, I find it necessary to reiterate certain factual observations from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API