Darrel Demont Farrar v. State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1ConcurrenceJim R. Wright, Justice
For the reasons stated in this opinion, I would hold that, under our current law, the State was required to and did prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecution was not limitations-barred. I would agree with the majority that appellant waived any error in connection with the ruling on his motion to quash. However, I would hold that the trial court was exercising appropriate discretion when it conducted an evidentiary pretrial hearing on appellant’s motion to quash the indictment. At the risk of being redundant, I find it necessary to reiterate certain factual observations from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.