Legal Opinion

Knauss v. Gruenwald

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 8, 1912Published

Appeal from Bcott District Court. — ÍIon. William Theopiiilus, Judge. Suit in equity to enjoin a liquor nuisance. A motion by defendant for more specific statement was sustained. The plaintiff elected tp stand upon her petition and refused to amend, whereupon the court dismissed her petition, and she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The petition charged the defendants with a maintenance of a liquor nuisance as follows: “Paragraph 2. That the defendants, Otto Gruenwald and August Zoller, have erected and are maintaining a liquor nuisance in a building situated on a part of the southwest quarter of section 33, township 78 north, range 3 east of the fifth P. M., being two and one-half acres in the southwest corner of the southwest quarter of said section, Scott county, state of Iowa, wherein they keep for sale and sell in violation of law intoxicating liquor as a beverage, to wit, ale, beer, wine, whisky,' and other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pumphrey v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Abrams v. SandholmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API