Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Sandholm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. O. P. Holmes, Judge. Action in equity, under Code, section 2384, to enjoin defendant from maintaining a liquor nuisance. Defendant’s motion for more specific statement was sustained, and, plaintiff electing to stand on- his petition, judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The essential allegations in the petition filed by plaintiff are that defendant has established, and is keeping, using, and maintaining a certain building, described, as a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors in violation of law, and as a place for the keeping of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same in violation of law; also that defendant has heretofore, from day to day; *584illegally sold intoxicating liquors in said building and at said place, and has kept intoxicating liquors in said building and at said place from day to day for the purpose and with intent to sell the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pumphrey v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Bowers v. MaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Brennan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Fisher v. J. T. Stoevenor & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Knauss v. GruenwaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API