Legal Opinion
Maine v. Norton
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 11, 2002No. CIV.00-250-B-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESOLVE PRIVILEGE ISSUES
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
This case raises a challenge to the Defendants (“the Services”) decision to list a distinct population segment (“DPS”) of Atlantic Salmon as endangered under the listing provisions of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533. Pursuant to the Court’s Revised Scheduling Order, the Services produced “all non-privileged documents that [the Services] contend constitute the administrative record,” together with a “Privilege Log” describing documents that they were not producing. The log includes a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilkinson v. ChaoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. ImpsonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Planalto v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009