Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Merritt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1987No. 17061PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

The question presented for our decision in this original mandamus action is whether the Workers’ Compensation Commissioner may apply emergency rules for evaluating the results of blood gas studies to occupational pneumoconiosis claims pending at the time the rules were promulgated. For the reasons stated below, we answer in the affirmative, and decline to issue the writ.

The facts are as follows: On 14 April 1983, petitioner Paul W. Boyd filed with the commissioner an application for occupational pneumoconiosis disability benefits. On 19 March 1984, the commissioner made a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kucera v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sizemore v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rasmus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bounds v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pnakovich v. SWCCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. ACF Industries, Inc. v. ViewegWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Huffman v. Goals Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roberts v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Abraham Linc. Corp. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API