Legal Opinion

Jones v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P. C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-3488Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMOS N. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3488 (RDM) OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P.C., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action, Plaintiff Amos N. Jones, an attorney proceeding pro se, asserts claims against the law firm Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P.C. (“Ogletree”), under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, the D.C. Bias-Related Crime Act,

D.C. Code § 22

- 3701 et seq., and D.C. common law. Ogletree moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons given below,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API