Legal Opinion

O'Laughlin v. Prockish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1920No. 22,627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ellis district court; Isaac T. Purcell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The appellant complains because the trial court overruled his “plea in abatement.” The action, which was for forcible detainer, originated in the justice court and was appealed to the district court. Two juries in that court failed to agree, and the cause was continued to a later term, by which time the defendant had vacated the premises. The plea in abatement was based upon that fact, also upon the fact that certain orders of court in another action had brought about the eviction of the appellant, and'consequently that the questions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Geinger v. KreinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Payne Shoe Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Ferris v. FerrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  4. Hall v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryson v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Pate v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API