Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Hornik

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1929No. 12590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

The order of his Honor, Judge Grimball, overruling'a demurrer to the complaint, is entirely satisfactory to this Court, and, for the reasons stated by him, is affirmed. See Browne v. Hammett, 133 S. C., 446, 131 S. E., 612; Hernlen v. Vandiver, 145 S. C., 412, 143 S. E., 222; Gary v. Matthews, 148 S. C., 125, 145 S. E., 702.

The following will be reported: (1) The complaint, except paragraph 9. (2) The demurrer. (3) The order of the Circuit Court.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices . BleasE and ‘Carter concur. Mr. Justice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Gary v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Hernlen v. VandiverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ridgeland Box Mfg. Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Rawls v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API