Legal Opinion

Pollen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 1, 1937No. 43391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

Section 164 of the Judicial Code confers jurisdiction upon this court to call upon any Department of the Government for information or papers considered by the court as necessary in the adjudication of cases before this court. This section in its entirety contains the following provisions:

Seo. 164. The said court shall have power to call upon any of the departments for any information or papers it may deem necessary, and shall have the use of all recorded and printed reports made by the committees of each House of Congress, when deemed necessary in the prosecution of its business. But the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. E. W. Bliss Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Brodie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  5. Isham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Adele Halkin v. Richard Helms, Department of State Adele Halkin v. Richard Helms, Department of State, Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of Defense in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. WeissUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Halkin v. HelmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API