Legal Opinion

Blakeman v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1902No. S.F. No. 2660PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The case is as follows: A deed of lease was executed by A. Th. Louis Miller to John Apel, leasing to the latter premises in the city of San Francisco, therein described, for the term of twenty years from the first day of August, 1894, for the aggregate rental of $62,400, payable in monthly installments of $260, and containing a covenant by which the party of the first part binds “himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators to sell and convey unto said party of the second part, his heirs or assigns, all the said property at any time after the expiration of fifteen years of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. California Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. SeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Thurber v. MevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API