Legal Opinion

Tad Malpass v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2013No. Docket 144430, 144431, 144432, 145367, 145368, 145369, and 145370PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtViviano, J.

In these consolidated cases, we address the application of Michigan’s statutory apportionment formula for individuals with flow-through business income under the Michigan Income Tax Act (ITA). In both cases, the individual taxpayers received income from in-state and out-of-state, flow-through businesses. The Michigan Department of Treasury (Department) refused the taxpayers’ attempts to combine the flow-through income from their respective businesses and then apportion the income using the businesses’ combined apportionment factors, and instead required the income of each entity to be…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. PinkneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. International Business MacHines Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. in Re Certified Question (Deacon v. Pandora)Michigan Supreme Court · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API