Legal Opinion
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1952No. 13792_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
In this suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in an automobile accident, appellant, as defendant, suffered an adverse verdict and judgment. In this appeal it assigns error upon the grounds: that the admission in evidence over the objection of appellant of testimony of an injury to the left knee of plaintiff of a different nature and more serious extent than that alleged in the complaint, was erroneous; error in failing to set aside the verdict because of its excessiveness ; in failing to set aside the verdict and judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dowell, Inc. v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. PiddCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Gillen v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
3Cited by14 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Company v. Wallace Butts, Wallace Butts v. Curtis Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,202 Sundstrand Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Standard Kollsman Industries, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Lanier v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- National Liability & Fire Insurance v. R & R Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Butts v. Curtis Publishing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.