Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ali

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 18, 2012No. 12-0008/AR; Crim.App. 20080559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceBaker, Chief Judge

INTRODUCTION

I concur in the reasoning and the result with respect to Issue II.1 I write separately regarding Issue I because, while I agree with the result, I believe the essential and threshold question in this case is whether Congress possesses the authority to amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to include within its jurisdiction civilian contractors serving with or accompanying the United States Armed Forces. Working forward from Article I of the United States Constitution, rather than backward from the Bill of Rights, Congress must have an enumerated and positive authority…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API