Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Scott
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1983No. 81-3-473PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
Following a non-jury trial appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person, a weapons offense and conspiracy. After post-verdict motions were filed and argued, the trial court granted a new *627trial on the grounds of after-discovered evidence. On appeal by the Commonwealth a Superior Court panel (Opinion, Watkins, J., joined by Brosky and Montgomery, JJ.) reversed and reinstated the original verdicts. Commonwealth v. Scott, 284 Pa.Super. 440, 426 A.2d 128 (1981). This appeal followed. The pertinent factual and procedural history is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glickstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Commonwealth v. CooneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Commonwealth v. YarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.