Midas Oil Co. v. Whitaker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Justice.
Midas Oil Company sued G. W. Whitaker and others. This suit required interpretation by the court of the following provision in an assignment of an oil and gas lease,- to-wit: “Assignor retaining an overriding royalty of ⅞2 of all oil, gas or other minerals produced from said land free of cost to himself, provided, however, that in the event any well drilled on said land quits flowing oil and produces less than 150 barrels per day of 24 hours, to be determined by an average of ten days pumping test after notice to assignor, said overriding royalty interest shall be reduced to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Butler v. Jenkins Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Exum v. LaubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. HyderTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Coleman v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Tarver v. BrackenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Kingwood Oil Co. v. LoehrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- McLachlan v. StroubeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.