Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen Wauneka

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1988No. 86-1385PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

This is the second appeal in this prosecution for crimes committed on an Indian reservation. The Government brought the first appeal, attacking a pretrial order that suppressed the defendant’s statements to federal investigators. We affirmed the district court’s finding that the defendant, Allen Wauneka, was subjected to custodial interrogation on January 20, 1984 at the time he was asked whether he had raped a nurse at Fort Defiance, Arizona in December of 1983. Accordingly, we excluded the confession to that crime that Wauneka gave after he was taken into custody but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 United States of America v. Miguel PolancoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Fawaz YunisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API