Darwin v. West

It is first argued that the court was in error in compelling appellant to make her claim more definite and certain. The original claim as filed demanded the reasonable value of care, support,-and maintenance furnished to Mary West and Lizzie Geise. This is followed by the statement that claimant and her husband deeded the house in Robbins-dale, Minnesota, to Mary West in consideration of her agreement not to change her will, and that she thereafter did change her will. It then requests that the claim be allowed “in such sum as may be justified by the facts and authorized by law.” The court…