Legal Opinion

Dow Family, LLC v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2014No. 2013AP000221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. In 2009, Dow Family, LLC, (Dow) purchased a condominium located at unit four in the Island of Happy Days Condominiums. Unfortunately, the purchase did not result in happy days for Dow because PHH Mortgage Corporation (PHH) asserted that the condominium remained burdened by a mortgage after closing. Dow asks this court to find that the outstanding mortgage is unenforceable. Specifically, Dow argues that even if PHH can prove it holds the underlying note in question, it does not follow that PHH also holds the mortgage, which would give PHH the right to bring a foreclosure action in regard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Kim v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, NaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Croft v. BunsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Tidioute Savings Bank v. LibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. KlomstenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Dow Family, LLC v. PHH Mortgage CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Long Lee, Miana Lee, Unlimited Wealth, LLC, David Blong, and Mee Lee v. Mai L. Vang and Ue YangUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API