Legal Opinion

Langenegger v. Carlsbad Irrigation District

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1971No. 9026PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

Respondent-appellant, New Mexico State Engineer (hereinafter referred to as Engineer) , after conducting a hearing, entered his decision approving the applications of appellant-applicants (hereinafter referred to as applicants), to supplement their rights to irrigation waters from the Pecos River, by diverting through wells, waters from the artesian aquifer of the Roswell Underground Basin. The protestant-appellee (hereinafter referred to as protestant), thereupon appealed the decision of the Engineer to the District Court of Chaves County, and the case was tried de novo…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Clodfelter v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Worley v. United States Borax and Chemical Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Application of BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. RICHLANDS IRR. CO. v. WESTVIEW IRR. CO. Et Al.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herrington v. State Ex Rel. Office of the State EngineerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Brantley v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ensenada Land & Water Ass'n v. SleeperNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API