Oxford v. Tom Huston Peanut Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
The material provisions of Code § 92-3113 read as follows: “The tax imposed by this law shall apply to the entire net income, as herein defined, received by every corporation, foreign or domestic, owning property or doing business in this State. Every such corporation shall be deemed to be doing business within this State if it engages within this State in any activities or transactions for the purpose of financial profit or gain, whether or not such corporation qualifies to do business in this State, and whether or not it maintains an office or place of doing business within…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Yearwood v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Young v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Quinan v. Standard Fuel Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hawes v. William L. Bonnell Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Lumia v. Roper Pump Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Blackmon v. Habersham Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975