QUALCOMM, INC. v. GTE Wireless, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING QUALCOMM’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is the motion by Qual-comm, Inc. to consolidate Civil Case No. 99-1951-B with Civil Case No. 99-2173-B.
II. BACKGROUND
On June 29, 1999, GTE Wireless, Inc. (“GTE”) filed suit against Qualcomm, Inc. (“Qualcomm”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. GTE alleged that Qualcomm was infringing on its U.S.Patent No. 4,916,728 (the “ ’728 Patent”), which patent relates to the identification, processing, and selection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. KarussosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knapp v. Depuy Synthes Sales Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- ElastiFlow, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Heard v. StrangeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021