Inland Waterway Development Co. v. City of Jacksonville
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SEBRING, J.:
The appellant, Inland Waterways Development Company, has filed in this Court a suggestion that an appeal taken by it from an adverse judgment rendered in an eminent domain proceeding has become moot and should be dismissed because of the failure of the plaintiff in the proceeding to pay into .the registry of the court below, within ten days after the rendition of the judgment, the full compensation awarded by the jury for the property sought to be appropriated.
The City of Jacksonville, a municipal corporation, instituted a proceeding under its power of eminent domain against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Seaboard All-Fla. Ry. Co. v. Levitt, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. BearSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baycol, Inc. v. Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Tosohatchee Game Pres. v. Central & So. Fla. Fl. CDSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Inland Waterway Develop. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Ervin v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Conner v. State Road Dept. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.