Legal Opinion

Sisko v. Chas. Kurz & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1951No. Civ. No. 11153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

In this action tried to the Court without a jury, plaintiff claims damages of the defendant shipowners for bodily harm sustained by him as a result of alleged unseaworthiness of the S.S. Andrew A. Humphreys upon which he was employed as a Quartermaster and/or negligence of the officers and crew of said vessel. The evidence discloses that the plaintiff is presently suffering from active pulmonary tuberculosis which he claims was either caused by or aggravated and activated by the action of the defendants. Upon pleadings and proof I make the following

Findings of Fact.

1.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond Quintin, Libelant-Appellant v. Sprague Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Raymond Quintin, Libelant-Appellant v. Sprague Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API