Legal Opinion

Smith v. Legg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendants in a suit involving two causes of action relating to legal services claimed to have been performed by plaintiffs for the defendants. Errors in the exclusion of certain testimony and in the charge of the Trial Justice require reversal and a new trial.

It is undisputed that none of the defendants actually asked the plaintiffs to perform the services in question or specifically agreed to pay for them. It is plaintiffs’ theory, however, that they were requested by one Hugh Dickson on behalf of himself and the named defendants to render such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walsh v. . Hartford Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Ruggles v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Franklin v. HoadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Franklin v. HoadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Laing v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgold, Inc. v. KeelerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Binderman v. KazdanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API