Legal Opinion

People v. Seeburger

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1997No. Docket 193635PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court granted defendant’s application for leave to appeal in order to decide whether MCL 257.625b(7); MSA 9.2325(2)(7) allows a driver with a restricted license to transport children to and from day care and school when the restricted driver is a working single parent. We hold that it does not.

i

FACTS

Following a guilty plea, defendant (a single mother) was convicted in the district court of operating a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUIL), MCL 257.625(1)(a); MSA 9.2325(1)(a). Defendant was sentenced to one year of probation, fined $200, and ordered to attend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rowell v. Security Steel Processing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. USAA Insurance v. Houston General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Barr v. Mt. Brighton Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. SpannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re Bail Bond ForfeitureMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API