Legal Opinion

Windle v. Citizens Nat. Bank Kolterman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Barton County. — Eon. B. G. Thurman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, P. J.

The plaintiff was denied any recovery in this suit in replevin for four horses and a set of harness and appeals. The pleadings are conventional, the plaintiffs claiming ownership and right of possession and the defendants doing the same. The material facts are not disputed. The plaintiffs in their firm name are engaged in buying and selling horses and mules at Joplin, Mo., and are the original owners of two of the horses and the set of harness in controversy. In April, 1917, a man representing himself to be J. W.'Hughes, offered to buy of plaintiffs the two horses and the set of harness. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Rodliff v. DallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Alexander v. SwackhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mackey v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Buhler Mill & Elevator Co. v. JollyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Rhea Mortgage Co. v. LemmermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. S. F. Bowser & Co. v. HartnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Throne v. Pa. Mutual Life Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API