Legal Opinion
Callahan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 18, 2005No. 04-2466PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider Plaintiffs claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The district court found that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiffs claim accrued more than two years before she filed her administrative complaint and that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment did not toll this requirement. Plaintiff contests these findings of the district court. We affirm.
I. Background
Mary Jane Callahan (“Plaintiff’), individually and as administratrix of the estate of John B. Callahan (“Callahan”), and members of her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Valentin-De-Jesus v. United HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Skwira v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ramirez-Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ouellette v. BeaupreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Roman-Cancel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Morales-Melecio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.