Thornely v. Andrews
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered May 5, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits, in an action to recover the possession of land and for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 18th day of November, 1890, Hattie E. Wells and husband conveyed to Mary E. Young, lot 7, of block 12, of Catlin’s Addition to the city of Tacoma, *414At or about the same time, the same grantors conveyed to-the plaintiffs in this action lots 8 and 9, of the same block. Lot 8 conveyed to the plaintiffs lies immediately south of lot 7 conveyed to Mrs. Young. On the 29th day of March, 1895, Mrs. Young and husband conveyed to Mary S. Clarke; on May 14, 1901, Mary S. Clarke conveyed to the defendant U. F. Giauque, and on June 7, 1904, the defendant Giauque conveyed to the defendant Harry…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowers v. LedgerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Suksdorf v. HumphreyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Wilcox v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Lindley v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Noyes v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arnold v. MelaniWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Butler v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- McCormick v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Mesher v. ConnollyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.