Porter v. . International Bridge Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 6, 1903, which reversed an order of Special Term directing a jury trial of the issues involved in the above-entitled action. The following questions were certified : First.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 6, 1903, which reversed an order of Special Term directing a jury trial of the issues involved in the above-entitled action. The following questions were certified : First. Had the defendants, the International Bridge Company and the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, a constitutional right to a trial by jury upon the facts proved, before the court made the order entered in the Erie county clerk’s office May 12, 1902, ordering a jury trial in this case?…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and both questions certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not voting; O’Brien and Bartlett, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. . International Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Simon v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911