Legal Opinion

Lucero v. New Mexico State Highway Department

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1951No. 5259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The appellants were the defendant and intervenor, respectively, .below and seek the reversal of an adverse judgment there rendered which awarded damages against the defendant in the sum of $5,000 on account of personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when he was struck by a tire blown from the wheel of a road grader being operated by a state employee. The intervenor had paid a consent judgment for more than $3,000 in a suit against it under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and sought subrogation in the amount paid on account of such claim.

The action was brought under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Hawks v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Jack v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Vigil v. Penitentiary of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Livingston Ex Rel. Livingston v. Regents of the New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic ArtsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Vigil v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API