Pugh v. Ciox Health, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHARLES PUGH, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Civil Action No. 8:22-cv-617-PX CIOX HEALTH, LLC, * Defendant. *** MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court in this consumer class action is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. (ECF No. 40). The motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion must be DENIED.1 I. Background On February 3, 2022, Plaintiffs Charles Pugh and Veronica Stewart, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, filed this class action in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.