Dickey v. Jansen
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1DissentEvans, Chief Justice
I disagree with the holding of the majority that the appellants’ pleading does not state a valid cause of action under Texas law.
In my opinion, the appellants alleged the essential elements of a third-party beneficiary action against the appellees. The appellants alleged their relationship with the testator; described their beneficial interest as devisees under the testator’s will; asserted that the testator had created the will for their benefit; and claimed that the attorney, who had prepared the will, represented to the testator that the will was legally and properly drawn and would…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Bryan & Amidei v. LawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Hatten v. Mohr Chevrolet CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.