Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dickey v. Jansen

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 9, 1987No. 01-86-0657-CVPublished

1DissentEvans, Chief Justice

I disagree with the holding of the majority that the appellants’ pleading does not state a valid cause of action under Texas law.

In my opinion, the appellants alleged the essential elements of a third-party beneficiary action against the appellees. The appellants alleged their relationship with the testator; described their beneficial interest as devisees under the testator’s will; asserted that the testator had created the will for their benefit; and claimed that the attorney, who had prepared the will, represented to the testator that the will was legally and properly drawn and would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  4. Bryan & Amidei v. LawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Hatten v. Mohr Chevrolet CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API