Legal Opinion

Hatten v. Mohr Chevrolet Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1963No. 16158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Jack Hatten brought this suit against two. defendants, Mohr Chevrolet Company and Republic National Bank of Dallas, alleging,. in two counts, a joint and several cause of action based upon allegations of fraud and collection of usurious interest. The trial court sustained defendant Mohr’s motion for summary judgment directed to the pleadings only, thereby holding, in effect, that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action against said defendant. (See footnote 1 ). The court severed the case as to Republic and Hatten brings this appeal, contending that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City Lincoln Mercury v. YbarraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. MacK v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Bradford v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Tyson v. ASSOCIATES INVESTMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Labbe v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Intercity Investments Co. v. PlowmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Garza v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. General Plywood Corporation v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Benson v. Grace Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API